Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) vs Goldshell CK-LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) | Specification | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 63.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.3 TH/s |
| 3,080 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| — | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 10,509 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th)
Goldshell CK-LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 908% more hashrate (63.5 vs 6.3 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th)'s favour. That said, the Goldshell CK-LITE isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) and Goldshell CK-LITE sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) 908% more hashrate (63.5 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 61% better power draw (3,080 vs 1,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) 75% better efficacité (48.5 vs 190.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) 157% more heat output (10,509 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 136% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) | Metric | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $1,860 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$3,724 | Net after 1 year | -$1,567 |
| -$5,588 | Net after 2 years | -$2,536 |
| -$7,451 | Net after 3 years | -$3,504 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-LITEScore: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th)48.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) or Goldshell CK-LITE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-LITE is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-5.11/day for the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) vs Goldshell CK-LITE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell CK-LITE is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) or the Goldshell CK-LITE?
The Goldshell CK-LITE scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) and Goldshell CK-LITE?
The Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-LITE runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 142.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficacité (48.5 vs 190.5 J/TH).