Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 17.7 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 86% better power draw (3,500 vs 500 W) in the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE's favour. The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) holds the edge in hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 370% more hashrate (9.4 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 86% better power draw (3,500 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 33% better efficacité (372 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 72% better weight (17.7 vs 5.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 600% more heat output (11,942 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 182% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $458 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$5,443 | Net after 1 year | -$870 |
| -$8,385 | Net after 2 years | -$1,281 |
| -$11,328 | Net after 3 years | -$1,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 122.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (372 vs 250 J/TH).