Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 9.4 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 3,500 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 372.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 17.7 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 431% more hashrate (1.8 vs 9.4 TH/s). The Antminer D9 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 431% more hashrate (1.8 vs 9.4 TH/s)
- Antminer D9 19% better power draw (2,839 vs 3,500 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 77% better efficacité (1,604 vs 372 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 9% better weight (16.1 vs 17.7 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 23% more heat output (9,687 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$8.06 |
| -$5,464 | Net after 1 year | -$5,442 |
| -$7,927 | Net after 2 years | -$8,385 |
| -$10,391 | Net after 3 years | -$11,327 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer D9 is more profitable at $-6.75/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer D9 or Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer D9 or Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) runs at 372.3 J/TH — a difference of 1,231.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (1,604 vs 372 J/TH).