Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs Iceriver KAS KS5M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 226.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 17.7 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS5M, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 39% better efficacité (372 vs 227 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KAS KS5M sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 60% more hashrate (9.4 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 3% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 39% better efficacité (372 vs 227 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 15% better weight (17.7 vs 15.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 3% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $449 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$7.62 |
| -$5,443 | Net after 1 year | -$3,230 |
| -$8,385 | Net after 2 years | -$6,012 |
| -$11,328 | Net after 3 years | -$8,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS5MScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the Iceriver KAS KS5M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS5M is more profitable at $-7.62/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The Iceriver KAS KS5M is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The Iceriver KAS KS5M scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KAS KS5M on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH — a difference of 145.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficacité (372 vs 227 J/TH).