Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer KS3

Antminer KS3

Taux de hachage 9.4 TH/s Puissance 3,500 W Efficiency 372.3 J/TH
VS
Bitmain S19k Pro

Bitmain S19k Pro

Taux de hachage 120.0 TH/s Puissance 2,760 W Efficiency 23.0 J/TH

Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain S19k Pro

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer KS3 Specification Bitmain S19k Pro
9.4 TH/s Taux de hachage 120.0 TH/s
3,500 W Consommation électrique 2,760 W
372.3 J/TH Efficiency 23.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
16.1 kg Weight 14.5 kg
11,942 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,417 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer KS3

Daily Revenue 0.00000433 BTC $0.34
Daily Electricity -$8.40
Daily Profit -$8.06
Monthly -$241.86
Yearly -$2,942.59

Bitmain S19k Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00005522 BTC $4.32
Daily Electricity -$6.62
Daily Profit -$2.31
Monthly -$69.23
Yearly -$842.30

Based on BTC price of $78,163 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain S19k Pro, which leads on 4 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 94% better efficacité (372.3 vs 23.0 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitmain S19k Pro — l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer KS3 and Bitmain S19k Pro sit on each measurable spec:

  • Bitmain S19k Pro 1177% more hashrate (9.4 vs 120.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain S19k Pro 21% better power draw (3,500 vs 2,760 W)
  • Bitmain S19k Pro 94% better efficacité (372.3 vs 23.0 J/TH)
  • Bitmain S19k Pro 10% better weight (16.1 vs 14.5 kg)
  • Antminer KS3 27% more heat output (11,942 vs 9,417 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer KS3 Metric Bitmain S19k Pro
$8,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $313
-$8.06 Daily net profit -$2.31
-$10,943 Net after 1 year -$1,155
-$13,885 Net after 2 years -$1,998
-$16,828 Net after 3 years -$2,840
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain S19k Pro

23.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer KS3 or the Bitmain S19k Pro?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain S19k Pro is more profitable at $-2.31/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain S19k Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer KS3 or Bitmain S19k Pro?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Antminer KS3 and Bitmain S19k Pro on J/TH?

The Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Bitmain S19k Pro runs at 23.0 J/TH — a difference of 349.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 94% better efficacité (372.3 vs 23.0 J/TH).