Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs IceRiver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) | Specification | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)
IceRiver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,171 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 1900% more hashrate (20.0 vs 1.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS1 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) and IceRiver KS1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 1900% more hashrate (20.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 80% better power draw (3,000 vs 600 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 75% better efficacité (150 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS1 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS1 5% better weight (15.8 vs 15.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 400% more heat output (10,236 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 42% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) | Metric | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$6.48 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$3,164 | Net after 1 year | -$3,012 |
| -$5,530 | Net after 2 years | -$3,525 |
| -$7,895 | Net after 3 years | -$4,037 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs IceRiver KS1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-6.48/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs IceRiver KS1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) or the IceRiver KS1?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs IceRiver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) runs at 150.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 450.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficacité (150 vs 600 J/TH).