Antminer L3+ vs Goldshell LT Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer L3+ | Specification | Goldshell LT Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 504.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.6 GH/s |
| 800 W | Consommation électrique | 1,450 W |
| 1,587,301.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 895,061.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 5.5 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,947 BTU/hr |
| 82/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer L3+
Goldshell LT Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell LT Lite, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 221% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer L3+ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer L3+ and Goldshell LT Lite actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell LT Lite 221% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer L3+ 45% better power draw (800 vs 1,450 W)
- Goldshell LT Lite 44% better efficacité (1,587,302 vs 895,062 J/TH)
- Antminer L3+ 100% better weight (5.5 vs 8,100.0 kg)
- Goldshell LT Lite 81% more heat output (2,730 vs 4,947 BTU/hr)
- Antminer L3+ 165% more score de minage domestique (82.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer L3+ | Metric | Goldshell LT Lite |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,298 |
| -$1.92 | Daily net profit | -$3.48 |
| -$701 | Net after 1 year | -$2,568 |
| -$1,402 | Net after 2 years | -$3,838 |
| -$2,102 | Net after 3 years | -$5,109 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer L3+Score: 82/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT Lite895,061.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer L3+ or the Goldshell LT Lite?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer L3+ is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-3.48/day for the Goldshell LT Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer L3+ vs Goldshell LT Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer L3+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell LT Lite at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer L3+ vs Goldshell LT Lite: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer L3+ scores 82/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell LT Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer L3+ and Goldshell LT Lite on J/TH?
The Antminer L3+ runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH while the Goldshell LT Lite runs at 895,061.7 J/TH — a difference of 692,239.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 44% better efficacité (1,587,302 vs 895,062 J/TH).