Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) vs FluMiner L2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) | Specification | FluMiner L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 GH/s |
| 3,425 W | Consommation électrique | 230 W |
| 360,526.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 230,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 15,000.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 11,686 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | FluMiner |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)
FluMiner L2
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le FluMiner L2 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 93% better power draw (3,425 vs 230 W). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) and FluMiner L2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 850% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- FluMiner L2 93% better power draw (3,425 vs 230 W)
- FluMiner L2 36% better efficacité (360,526 vs 230,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 1389% more heat output (11,686 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- FluMiner L2 200% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) | Metric | FluMiner L2 |
|---|---|---|
| $821 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $331 |
| -$8.22 | Daily net profit | -$0.55 |
| -$3,822 | Net after 1 year | -$533 |
| -$6,822 | Net after 2 years | -$734 |
| -$9,822 | Net after 3 years | -$936 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
FluMiner L2Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
FluMiner L2230,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) vs FluMiner L2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner L2 is more profitable at $-0.55/day compared to $-8.22/day for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) vs FluMiner L2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The FluMiner L2 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) or FluMiner L2?
The FluMiner L2 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) and FluMiner L2?
The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) runs at 360,526.3 J/TH while the FluMiner L2 runs at 230,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 130,526.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 36% better efficacité (360,526 vs 230,000 J/TH).