Antminer L9 vs FluMiner L2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer L9 | Specification | FluMiner L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 16,000.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 GH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 230 W |
| 210,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 230,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 14.8 kg | Weight | — |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | FluMiner |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer L9
FluMiner L2
Based on BTC price of $78,203 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Antminer L9 et le FluMiner L2 sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer L9 and FluMiner L2 sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer L9 1500% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- FluMiner L2 93% better power draw (3,360 vs 230 W)
- Antminer L9 9% better efficacité (210,000 vs 230,000 J/TH)
- FluMiner L2 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- Antminer L9 1361% more heat output (11,464 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- FluMiner L2 83% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer L9 | Metric | FluMiner L2 |
|---|---|---|
| $6,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $331 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$0.55 |
| -$9,443 | Net after 1 year | -$533 |
| -$12,386 | Net after 2 years | -$734 |
| -$15,329 | Net after 3 years | -$936 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
FluMiner L2Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer L9210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer L9 or FluMiner L2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner L2 is more profitable at $-0.55/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer L9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer L9 or FluMiner L2?
The FluMiner L2 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Antminer L9 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer L9 vs FluMiner L2: which fits a residential setup better?
The FluMiner L2 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer L9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer L9 and FluMiner L2?
The Antminer L9 runs at 210,000.0 J/TH while the FluMiner L2 runs at 230,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 20,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficacité (210,000 vs 230,000 J/TH).