Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Auradine Teraflux AI3680 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 375.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 5,625 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 19,193 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Auradine |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Based on BTC price of $66,854 and current network difficulty as of Mar 27, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Auradine Teraflux AI3680 l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Le Antminer Loki Edition (S9) a l'avantage en consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Auradine Teraflux AI3680 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-2.63/day compared to $-2.83/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Auradine Teraflux AI3680?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Auradine Teraflux AI3680?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Auradine Teraflux AI3680?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 81.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.