Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Specification | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.3 TH/s |
| 1,975 W | Consommation électrique | 1,077 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 6,739 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,675 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)
Ebang Ebit E9
Based on BTC price of $78,168 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 694% more hashrate (50.0 vs 6.3 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E9 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) and Ebang Ebit E9 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 694% more hashrate (50.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E9 45% better power draw (1,975 vs 1,077 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 77% better efficacité (39.5 vs 171.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 83% more heat output (6,739 vs 3,675 BTU/hr)
- Ebang Ebit E9 11% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Metric | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $370 |
| -$2.94 | Daily net profit | -$2.36 |
| -$1,487 | Net after 1 year | -$1,231 |
| -$2,560 | Net after 2 years | -$2,091 |
| -$3,634 | Net after 3 years | -$2,952 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Ebang Ebit E9Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or the Ebang Ebit E9?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E9 is more profitable at $-2.36/day compared to $-2.94/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9: which fits a residential setup better?
The Ebang Ebit E9 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) and Ebang Ebit E9?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 131.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (39.5 vs 171.0 J/TH).