Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs StealthMiner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Specification | StealthMiner |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 800.0 GH/s |
| 1,975 W | Consommation électrique | 18 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 22.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 28 dB |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 1.5 kg |
| 6,739 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 61 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)
StealthMiner
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the StealthMiner comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (1,975.0 vs 18.0 W). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) and StealthMiner actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 6150% more hashrate (50.0 vs 0.8 TH/s)
- StealthMiner 99% better power draw (1,975.0 vs 18.0 W)
- StealthMiner 43% better efficacité (39.5 vs 22.5 J/TH)
- StealthMiner 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 1.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 10875% more heat output (6,738.7 vs 61.4 BTU/hr)
- StealthMiner 150% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Metric | StealthMiner |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$2.94 | Daily net profit | -$0.01 |
| -$1,486 | Net after 1 year | -$204 |
| -$2,560 | Net after 2 years | -$210 |
| -$3,633 | Net after 3 years | -$215 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
StealthMinerScore: 70/100. 28 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
StealthMiner22.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs StealthMiner: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the StealthMiner is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-2.94/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or the StealthMiner better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The StealthMiner is quieter at 28 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or the StealthMiner?
The StealthMiner scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) and StealthMiner on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the StealthMiner runs at 22.5 J/TH — a difference of 17.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficacité (39.5 vs 22.5 J/TH).