Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M10S |
|---|---|---|
| 95.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 55.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 3,500 W |
| 34.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 63.6 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14,500.0 kg | Weight | 10,700.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th), which leads on 4 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 46% better efficacité (34.2 vs 63.6 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)'s favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M10S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 73% more hashrate (95.0 vs 55.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 7% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,500 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 46% better efficacité (34.2 vs 63.6 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 26% better weight (14,500 vs 10,700 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 8% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M10S |
|---|---|---|
| $215 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,800 |
| -$4.38 | Daily net profit | -$6.42 |
| -$1,814 | Net after 1 year | -$6,144 |
| -$3,413 | Net after 2 years | -$8,487 |
| -$5,013 | Net after 3 years | -$10,831 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)34.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) or MicroBT Whatsminer M10S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) is more profitable at $-4.38/day compared to $-6.42/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) or the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) or the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M10S on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) runs at 34.2 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH — a difference of 29.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 46% better efficacité (34.2 vs 63.6 J/TH).