Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Innosilicon T3+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Specification | Innosilicon T3+ |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 67.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 49.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Innosilicon T3+
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 40% better efficacité (29.6 vs 49.3 J/TH). That said, the Innosilicon T3+ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Innosilicon T3+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 64% more hashrate (110.0 vs 67.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 2% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,300 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 40% better efficacité (29.6 vs 49.3 J/TH)
- Innosilicon T3+ 100% better weight (13,200.0 vs 12.0 kg)
- Innosilicon T3+ 2% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon T3+ 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Metric | Innosilicon T3+ |
|---|---|---|
| $360 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$3.84 | Daily net profit | -$5.51 |
| -$1,762 | Net after 1 year | -$3,211 |
| -$3,165 | Net after 2 years | -$5,222 |
| -$4,567 | Net after 3 years | -$7,233 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon T3+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)29.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the Innosilicon T3+?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) is more profitable at $-3.84/day compared to $-5.51/day for the Innosilicon T3+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Innosilicon T3+: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Innosilicon T3+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Innosilicon T3+: which fits a residential setup better?
The Innosilicon T3+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Innosilicon T3+?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ runs at 49.3 J/TH — a difference of 19.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficacité (29.6 vs 49.3 J/TH).