Antminer S19 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 134.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 2,881 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,830 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 Pro
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 27% better efficacité (29.6 vs 21.5 J/TH). The Antminer S19 Pro claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 22% more hashrate (110 vs 134 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 11% better power draw (3,250 vs 2,881 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 27% better efficacité (29.6 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 Pro 13% more heat output (11,089 vs 9,830 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 Pro 282% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S19 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $483 |
| -$3.84 | Daily net profit | -$2.09 |
| -$3,902 | Net after 1 year | -$1,246 |
| -$5,304 | Net after 2 years | -$2,010 |
| -$6,706 | Net after 3 years | -$2,773 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 ProScore: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S19 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) is more profitable at $-2.09/day compared to $-3.84/day for the Antminer S19 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S19 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)?
The Antminer S19 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)?
The Antminer S19 Pro scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S19 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) on J/TH?
The Antminer S19 Pro runs at 29.6 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 8.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficacité (29.6 vs 21.5 J/TH).