Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M78
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 |
|---|---|---|
| 134.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 464.0 TH/s |
| 2,881 W | Consommation électrique | 6,728 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 18.0 kg |
| 9,830 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 22,956 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 246% more hashrate (134 vs 464 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 sit on each measurable spec:
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 246% more hashrate (134 vs 464 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 57% better power draw (2,881 vs 6,728 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 33% better efficacité (21.5 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 20% better weight (14.4 vs 18.0 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 134% more heat output (9,830 vs 22,956 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 |
|---|---|---|
| $483 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.09 | Daily net profit | $0.55 |
| -$1,247 | Net after 1 year | +$199 |
| -$2,011 | Net after 2 years | +$398 |
| -$2,776 | Net after 3 years | +$597 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78$2.64/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7814.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 is more profitable at $0.55/day compared to $-2.09/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or MicroBT WhatsMiner M78?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or MicroBT WhatsMiner M78?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 7.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (21.5 vs 14.5 J/TH).