Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) vs Whatsminer M60S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| 96.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 186.0 TH/s |
| 2,832 W | Consommation électrique | 3,480 W |
| 29.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 9,663 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,874 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th)
Whatsminer M60S
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M60S, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 94% more hashrate (96.0 vs 186.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) and Whatsminer M60S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M60S 94% more hashrate (96.0 vs 186.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) 19% better power draw (2,832 vs 3,480 W)
- Whatsminer M60S 37% better efficacité (29.5 vs 18.7 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M60S 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M60S 23% more heat output (9,663 vs 11,874 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M60S 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| $550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,500 |
| -$3.34 | Daily net profit | -$1.66 |
| -$1,770 | Net after 1 year | -$6,106 |
| -$2,990 | Net after 2 years | -$6,712 |
| -$4,211 | Net after 3 years | -$7,318 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S18.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) vs Whatsminer M60S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S is more profitable at $-1.66/day compared to $-3.34/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) or Whatsminer M60S?
The Whatsminer M60S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) or Whatsminer M60S?
The Whatsminer M60S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) and Whatsminer M60S on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) runs at 29.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S runs at 18.7 J/TH — a difference of 10.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 37% better efficacité (29.5 vs 18.7 J/TH).