MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M60S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 186.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,480 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10,700.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,874 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
Whatsminer M60S
Based on BTC price of $78,194 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M60S edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 71% better efficacité (63.6 vs 18.7 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and Whatsminer M60S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M60S 238% more hashrate (55.0 vs 186.0 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M60S 1% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,480 W)
- Whatsminer M60S 71% better efficacité (63.6 vs 18.7 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M60S 100% better weight (10,700.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 1% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,874 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M60S 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,500 |
| -$6.42 | Daily net profit | -$1.66 |
| -$6,144 | Net after 1 year | -$6,106 |
| -$8,487 | Net after 2 years | -$6,711 |
| -$10,831 | Net after 3 years | -$7,317 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S18.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M60S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S is more profitable at $-1.66/day compared to $-6.42/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or Whatsminer M60S?
The Whatsminer M60S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M60S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M60S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and Whatsminer M60S on J/TH?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S runs at 18.7 J/TH — a difference of 44.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficacité (63.6 vs 18.7 J/TH).