Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 33.0 TH/s |
| 1,100 W | Consommation électrique | 2,600 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 78.8 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.5 kg | Weight | 10,000.0 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,871 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 175% more hashrate (12.0 vs 33.0 TH/s) in the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+'s favour. That said, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ sit on each measurable spec:
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 175% more hashrate (12.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 58% better power draw (1,100 vs 2,600 W)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 14% better efficacité (91.7 vs 78.8 J/TH)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 100% better weight (3.5 vs 10,000.0 kg)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 136% more heat output (3,753 vs 8,871 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 136% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Metric | Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ |
|---|---|---|
| $350 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.21 | Daily net profit | -$5.05 |
| -$1,156 | Net after 1 year | -$1,844 |
| -$1,962 | Net after 2 years | -$3,688 |
| -$2,768 | Net after 3 years | -$5,532 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+78.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.21/day compared to $-5.05/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ on J/TH?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ runs at 78.8 J/TH — a difference of 12.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficacité (91.7 vs 78.8 J/TH).
Compare Antminer Slim Edition (S9) with...
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator