Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Avalon A1346
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) | Specification | Avalon A1346 |
|---|---|---|
| 23.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 110.0 TH/s |
| 1,541 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 67.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 6,600.0 kg | Weight | 12.3 kg |
| 5,258 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)
Avalon A1346
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1346 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 378% more hashrate (23.0 vs 110.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) and Avalon A1346 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1346 378% more hashrate (23.0 vs 110.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 53% better power draw (1,541 vs 3,300 W)
- Avalon A1346 55% better efficacité (67.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- Avalon A1346 100% better weight (6,600.0 vs 12.3 kg)
- Avalon A1346 114% more heat output (5,258 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1346 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) | Metric | Avalon A1346 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,800 |
| -$2.87 | Daily net profit | -$3.96 |
| -$1,048 | Net after 1 year | -$4,245 |
| -$2,095 | Net after 2 years | -$5,691 |
| -$3,143 | Net after 3 years | -$7,136 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1346Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A134630.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Avalon A1346: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) is more profitable at $-2.87/day compared to $-3.96/day for the Avalon A1346. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Avalon A1346: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Avalon A1346 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) or Avalon A1346?
The Avalon A1346 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) and Avalon A1346 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) runs at 67.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 37.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficacité (67.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).