Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) vs Ebang Ebit E11++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) | Specification | Ebang Ebit E11++ |
|---|---|---|
| 12.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 44.0 TH/s |
| 1,576 W | Consommation électrique | 1,980 W |
| 126.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3,800.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 5,377 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,756 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th)
Ebang Ebit E11++
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Ebang Ebit E11++ l'emporte sur 2 des 3 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 252% more hashrate (12.5 vs 44.0 TH/s) in the Ebang Ebit E11++'s favour. The Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) and Ebang Ebit E11++ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Ebang Ebit E11++ 252% more hashrate (12.5 vs 44.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) 20% better power draw (1,576 vs 1,980 W)
- Ebang Ebit E11++ 64% better efficacité (126.1 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Ebang Ebit E11++ 26% more heat output (5,377 vs 6,756 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) | Metric | Ebang Ebit E11++ |
|---|---|---|
| $1,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.33 | Daily net profit | -$3.17 |
| -$2,316 | Net after 1 year | -$1,156 |
| -$3,533 | Net after 2 years | -$2,313 |
| -$4,749 | Net after 3 years | -$3,469 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Ebang Ebit E11++45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) or the Ebang Ebit E11++?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E11++ is more profitable at $-3.17/day compared to $-3.33/day for the Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) or Ebang Ebit E11++?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) or Ebang Ebit E11++?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) and Ebang Ebit E11++ on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) runs at 126.1 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E11++ runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 81.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficacité (126.1 vs 45.0 J/TH).