Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)
Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) vs Baikal BK-N
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) | Specification | Baikal BK-N |
|---|---|---|
| 220.0 KH/s | Taux de hachage | 40.0 KH/s |
| 465 W | Consommation électrique | 60 W |
| 2,113,636,363.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 5,500.0 kg | Weight | 1,800.0 kg |
| 1,587 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 205 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Cryptonight | Algorithme | Cryptonight |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)
Baikal BK-N
Based on BTC price of $76,885 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Baikal BK-N l'emporte sur 3 des 3 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 87% better power draw (465.0 vs 60.0 W) in the Baikal BK-N's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) and Baikal BK-N sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) 450% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-N 87% better power draw (465.0 vs 60.0 W)
- Baikal BK-N 29% better efficacité (2,113,636,364 vs 1,500,000,000 J/TH)
- Baikal BK-N 67% better weight (5,500 vs 1,800 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) 675% more heat output (1,587 vs 205 BTU/hr)
- Baikal BK-N 6% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) | Metric | Baikal BK-N |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $500 |
| -$1.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.14 |
| -$407 | Net after 1 year | -$553 |
| -$815 | Net after 2 years | -$605 |
| -$1,222 | Net after 3 years | -$658 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-NScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal BK-N1,500,000,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) or Baikal BK-N more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N is more profitable at $-0.14/day compared to $-1.12/day for the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) or Baikal BK-N?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) vs Baikal BK-N: which fits a residential setup better?
The Baikal BK-N scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) and Baikal BK-N on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer X3 (220Kh) runs at 2,113,636,363.6 J/TH while the Baikal BK-N runs at 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 613,636,363.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 29% better efficacité (2,113,636,364 vs 1,500,000,000 J/TH).