Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Taux de hachage 600.0 TH/s Puissance 8,700 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
VS
GMO miner B3

GMO miner B3

Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s Puissance 3,417 W Efficiency 103.6 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs GMO miner B3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 Specification GMO miner B3
600.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s
8,700 W Consommation électrique 3,417 W
14.5 J/TH Efficiency 103.6 J/TH
60 dB Niveau de bruit
Weight 5,000.0 kg
29,684 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,659 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer GMO miner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Daily Revenue 0.00027611 BTC $21.58
Daily Electricity -$20.88
Daily Profit $0.70
Monthly $21.15
Yearly $257.29

GMO miner B3

Daily Revenue 0.00001519 BTC $1.19
Daily Electricity -$8.20
Daily Profit -$7.01
Monthly -$210.41
Yearly -$2,559.98

Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 1718% more hashrate (600.0 vs 33.0 TH/s). The GMO miner B3 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AH3880 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 and GMO miner B3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 1718% more hashrate (600.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
  • GMO miner B3 61% better power draw (8,700 vs 3,417 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 86% better efficacité (14.5 vs 103.6 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 155% more heat output (29,684 vs 11,659 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

$7.72/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

GMO miner B3

Score: 22/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or the GMO miner B3?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 is more profitable at $0.70/day compared to $-7.01/day for the GMO miner B3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs GMO miner B3: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Auradine Teraflux AH3880 is quieter at 60 dB compared to the GMO miner B3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs GMO miner B3: which fits a residential setup better?

The GMO miner B3 scores 22/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AH3880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AH3880 and GMO miner B3?

The Auradine Teraflux AH3880 runs at 14.5 J/TH while the GMO miner B3 runs at 103.6 J/TH — a difference of 89.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (14.5 vs 103.6 J/TH).