Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Taux de hachage 375.0 TH/s Puissance 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Ebang Ebit E11++

Ebang Ebit E11++

Taux de hachage 44.0 TH/s Puissance 1,980 W Efficiency 45.0 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Ebang Ebit E11++

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Specification Ebang Ebit E11++
375.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 44.0 TH/s
5,625 W Consommation électrique 1,980 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 45.0 J/TH
55 dB Niveau de bruit
Weight
19,193 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,756 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer Ebang

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00017257 BTC $13.50
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit -$0.00
Monthly -$0.06
Yearly -$0.74

Ebang Ebit E11++

Daily Revenue 0.00002025 BTC $1.58
Daily Electricity -$4.75
Daily Profit -$3.17
Monthly -$95.05
Yearly -$1,156.41

Based on BTC price of $78,218 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 752% more hashrate (375.0 vs 44.0 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E11++ holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AI3680 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Ebang Ebit E11++ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 752% more hashrate (375.0 vs 44.0 TH/s)
  • Ebang Ebit E11++ 65% better power draw (5,625 vs 1,980 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 67% better efficacité (15.0 vs 45.0 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 184% more heat output (19,193 vs 6,756 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Ebang Ebit E11++

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Ebang Ebit E11++: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-3.17/day for the Ebang Ebit E11++. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Ebang Ebit E11++?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E11++ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Ebang Ebit E11++?

The Ebang Ebit E11++ scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Ebang Ebit E11++: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E11++ runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 30.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficacité (15.0 vs 45.0 J/TH).