Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T |
|---|---|---|
| 375.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 30.0 TH/s |
| 5,625 W | Consommation électrique | 2,400 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 80.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 9,000.0 kg |
| 19,193 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T
Based on BTC price of $66,039 and current network difficulty as of Mar 27, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Auradine Teraflux AI3680 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Le Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T a l'avantage en consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30TScore: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-1.86/day compared to $-4.83/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T?
The Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T runs at 80.0 J/TH — a difference of 65.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer S17
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 29T/30T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator