Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1366 | Specification | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 1,400 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 350.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 12.6 kg | Weight | 0.7 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,777 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1366
Canaan Avalon Nano 3
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1366 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 3150% more hashrate (130.0 vs 4.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1366's favour. The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1366 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1366 3150% more hashrate (130.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 57% better power draw (3,250 vs 1,400 W)
- Avalon A1366 93% better efficacité (25.0 vs 350.0 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 94% better weight (12.6 vs 0.7 kg)
- Avalon A1366 132% more heat output (11,089 vs 4,777 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3 83% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1366 | Metric | Canaan Avalon Nano 3 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $149 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$3.22 |
| -$4,640 | Net after 1 year | -$1,323 |
| -$5,780 | Net after 2 years | -$2,497 |
| -$6,920 | Net after 3 years | -$3,671 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3Score: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1366 or Canaan Avalon Nano 3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1366 is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-3.22/day for the Canaan Avalon Nano 3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1366 or the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Avalon A1366 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3 runs at 350.0 J/TH — a difference of 325.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 93% better efficacité (25.0 vs 350.0 J/TH).