Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1366 | Specification | Canaan Avalon Nano 3S |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 140 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 23.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 30 dB |
| 12.6 kg | Weight | 0.9 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 478 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1366
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 96% better power draw (3,250 vs 140 W). The Avalon A1366 claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1366 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1366 2067% more hashrate (130.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 96% better power draw (3,250 vs 140 W)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 7% better efficacité (25.0 vs 23.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 60% better noise (75.0 vs 30.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 93% better weight (12.6 vs 0.9 kg)
- Avalon A1366 2221% more heat output (11,089 vs 478 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Nano 3S 81% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Avalon A1366 | Metric | Canaan Avalon Nano 3S |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $145 |
| -$3.13 | Daily net profit | -$0.12 |
| -$4,641 | Net after 1 year | -$189 |
| -$5,781 | Net after 2 years | -$233 |
| -$6,922 | Net after 3 years | -$277 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Nano 3SScore: 65/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Nano 3S23.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1366 or Canaan Avalon Nano 3S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is more profitable at $-0.12/day compared to $-3.13/day for the Avalon A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Avalon A1366 or Canaan Avalon Nano 3S?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Avalon A1366 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1366 or the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S?
The Canaan Avalon Nano 3S scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1366 and Canaan Avalon Nano 3S?
The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Nano 3S runs at 23.3 J/TH — a difference of 1.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (25.0 vs 23.3 J/TH).