Avalon A1466 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1066
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1466 | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 |
|---|---|---|
| 150.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 50.0 TH/s |
| 3,230 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 65.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 11,400.0 kg |
| 11,021 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1466
Canaan AvalonMiner 1066
Based on BTC price of $78,163 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1466 l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 67% better efficacité (21.5 vs 65.0 J/TH) in the Avalon A1466's favour. That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1466 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1466 200% more hashrate (150.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
- Avalon A1466 1% better power draw (3,230 vs 3,250 W)
- Avalon A1466 67% better efficacité (21.5 vs 65.0 J/TH)
- Avalon A1466 100% better weight (12.8 vs 11,400.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 1% more heat output (11,021 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1466 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Avalon A1466 | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 |
|---|---|---|
| $4,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,255 |
| -$2.36 | Daily net profit | -$6.00 |
| -$5,060 | Net after 1 year | -$3,446 |
| -$5,920 | Net after 2 years | -$5,636 |
| -$6,780 | Net after 3 years | -$7,827 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1466Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A146621.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1466 or Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1466 is more profitable at $-2.36/day compared to $-6.00/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Avalon A1466 or Canaan AvalonMiner 1066?
The Avalon A1466 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1466 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066?
The Avalon A1466 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1466 and Canaan AvalonMiner 1066?
The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 runs at 65.0 J/TH — a difference of 43.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficacité (21.5 vs 65.0 J/TH).