Avalon A1466 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 821
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1466 | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 821 |
|---|---|---|
| 150.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.5 TH/s |
| 3,230 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 104.4 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 4,700.0 kg |
| 11,021 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1466
Canaan AvalonMiner 821
Based on BTC price of $78,130 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1466 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 1204% more hashrate (150.0 vs 11.5 TH/s). That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 821 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Avalon A1466 and Canaan AvalonMiner 821 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1466 1204% more hashrate (150.0 vs 11.5 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 821 63% better power draw (3,230 vs 1,200 W)
- Avalon A1466 79% better efficacité (21.5 vs 104.4 J/TH)
- Avalon A1466 100% better weight (12.8 vs 4,700.0 kg)
- Avalon A1466 169% more heat output (11,021 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1466 16% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1466 | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 821 |
|---|---|---|
| $4,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$2.36 | Daily net profit | -$2.47 |
| -$5,061 | Net after 1 year | -$1,599 |
| -$5,922 | Net after 2 years | -$2,500 |
| -$6,783 | Net after 3 years | -$3,400 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1466Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A146621.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Avalon A1466 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 821?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1466 is more profitable at $-2.36/day compared to $-2.47/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 821. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1466 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 821 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Avalon A1466 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 821 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Avalon A1466 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 821: which fits a residential setup better?
The Avalon A1466 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 821). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Avalon A1466 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 821: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 821 runs at 104.4 J/TH — a difference of 82.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (21.5 vs 104.4 J/TH).