Avalon A1346 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 821
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1346 | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 821 |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.5 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 104.4 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 4,700.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1346
Canaan AvalonMiner 821
Based on BTC price of $78,130 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1346, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 857% more hashrate (110.0 vs 11.5 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 821 claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1346 and Canaan AvalonMiner 821 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1346 857% more hashrate (110.0 vs 11.5 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 821 64% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,200 W)
- Avalon A1346 71% better efficacité (30.0 vs 104.4 J/TH)
- Avalon A1346 100% better weight (12.3 vs 4,700.0 kg)
- Avalon A1346 175% more heat output (11,260 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1346 16% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1346 | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 821 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$3.97 | Daily net profit | -$2.47 |
| -$4,247 | Net after 1 year | -$1,599 |
| -$5,694 | Net after 2 years | -$2,500 |
| -$7,142 | Net after 3 years | -$3,400 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1346Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A134630.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Avalon A1346 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 821: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 821 is more profitable at $-2.47/day compared to $-3.97/day for the Avalon A1346. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 821 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Avalon A1346 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 821 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan AvalonMiner 821?
The Avalon A1346 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 821). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Avalon A1346 vs Canaan AvalonMiner 821: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 821 runs at 104.4 J/TH — a difference of 74.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficacité (30.0 vs 104.4 J/TH).