Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1466

Avalon A1466

Taux de hachage 150.0 TH/s Puissance 3,230 W Efficiency 21.5 J/TH
VS
Ebang Ebit E9

Ebang Ebit E9

Taux de hachage 6.3 TH/s Puissance 1,077 W Efficiency 171.0 J/TH

Avalon A1466 vs Ebang Ebit E9

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1466 Specification Ebang Ebit E9
150.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 6.3 TH/s
3,230 W Consommation électrique 1,077 W
21.5 J/TH Efficiency 171.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
12.8 kg Weight
11,021 BTU/hr BTU Output 3,675 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Ebang

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1466

Daily Revenue 0.00006903 BTC $5.40
Daily Electricity -$7.75
Daily Profit -$2.36
Monthly -$70.69
Yearly -$860.04

Ebang Ebit E9

Daily Revenue 0.00000290 BTC $0.23
Daily Electricity -$2.58
Daily Profit -$2.36
Monthly -$70.75
Yearly -$860.74

Based on BTC price of $78,168 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1466 l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 2281% more hashrate (150.0 vs 6.3 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E9 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Avalon A1466 — l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Avalon A1466 and Ebang Ebit E9 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Avalon A1466 2281% more hashrate (150.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
  • Ebang Ebit E9 67% better power draw (3,230 vs 1,077 W)
  • Avalon A1466 87% better efficacité (21.5 vs 171.0 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1466 200% more heat output (11,021 vs 3,675 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1466 16% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1466 Metric Ebang Ebit E9
$4,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $370
-$2.36 Daily net profit -$2.36
-$5,060 Net after 1 year -$1,231
-$5,920 Net after 2 years -$2,091
-$6,780 Net after 3 years -$2,952
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1466

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1466

21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Avalon A1466 or Ebang Ebit E9 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1466 is more profitable at $-2.36/day compared to $-2.36/day for the Ebang Ebit E9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1466 or Ebang Ebit E9?

The Avalon A1466 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E9 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Avalon A1466 vs Ebang Ebit E9: which fits a residential setup better?

The Avalon A1466 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Ebang Ebit E9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Avalon A1466 and Ebang Ebit E9 on J/TH?

The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 149.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficacité (21.5 vs 171.0 J/TH).