Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 vs Innosilicon T3+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 | Specification | Innosilicon T3+ |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 67.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 49.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 13.0 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Innosilicon T3+
Based on BTC price of $78,277 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 49% better efficacité (25.0 vs 49.3 J/TH). The Innosilicon T3+ claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 and Innosilicon T3+ sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 94% more hashrate (130.0 vs 67.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 2% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,300 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 49% better efficacité (25.0 vs 49.3 J/TH)
- Innosilicon T3+ 8% better weight (13.0 vs 12.0 kg)
- Innosilicon T3+ 2% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon T3+ 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 | Metric | Innosilicon T3+ |
|---|---|---|
| $699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$5.51 |
| -$1,837 | Net after 1 year | -$3,210 |
| -$2,975 | Net after 2 years | -$5,220 |
| -$4,112 | Net after 3 years | -$7,230 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon T3+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 or Innosilicon T3+ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-5.51/day for the Innosilicon T3+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 vs Innosilicon T3+: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Innosilicon T3+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 vs Innosilicon T3+: which fits a residential setup better?
The Innosilicon T3+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 and Innosilicon T3+ on J/TH?
The Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ runs at 49.3 J/TH — a difference of 24.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 49% better efficacité (25.0 vs 49.3 J/TH).