iPollo B1L vs Pantech SX6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo B1L | Specification | Pantech SX6 |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.5 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 1,000 W |
| 51.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 117.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12,700.0 kg | Weight | 3,000.0 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,412 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Pantech |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo B1L
Pantech SX6
Based on BTC price of $77,040 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo B1L l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 582% more hashrate (58.0 vs 8.5 TH/s) in the iPollo B1L's favour. The Pantech SX6 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo B1L and Pantech SX6 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo B1L 582% more hashrate (58.0 vs 8.5 TH/s)
- Pantech SX6 67% better power draw (3,000 vs 1,000 W)
- iPollo B1L 56% better efficacité (51.7 vs 117.7 J/TH)
- Pantech SX6 76% better weight (12,700 vs 3,000 kg)
- iPollo B1L 200% more heat output (10,236 vs 3,412 BTU/hr)
- Pantech SX6 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo B1L | Metric | Pantech SX6 |
|---|---|---|
| $430 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.14 | Daily net profit | -$2.10 |
| -$2,307 | Net after 1 year | -$766 |
| -$4,185 | Net after 2 years | -$1,532 |
| -$6,062 | Net after 3 years | -$2,298 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Pantech SX6Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo B1L51.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo B1L or Pantech SX6 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Pantech SX6 is more profitable at $-2.10/day compared to $-5.14/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo B1L vs Pantech SX6: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo B1L or the Pantech SX6?
The Pantech SX6 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo B1L and Pantech SX6 on J/TH?
The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the Pantech SX6 runs at 117.7 J/TH — a difference of 65.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (51.7 vs 117.7 J/TH).