Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitaxe GT

Bitaxe GT

Taux de hachage 5.0 TH/s Puissance 75 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s Puissance 2,600 W Efficiency 78.8 J/TH

Bitaxe GT vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe GT Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
5.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s
75 W Consommation électrique 2,600 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 78.8 J/TH
42 dB Niveau de bruit
0.4 kg Weight 10,000.0 kg
256 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,871 BTU/hr
64/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe GT

Daily Revenue 0.00000230 BTC $0.18
Daily Electricity -$0.18
Daily Profit $0.00
Monthly $0.00
Yearly $0.02

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Daily Revenue 0.00001519 BTC $1.19
Daily Electricity -$6.24
Daily Profit -$5.05
Monthly -$151.55
Yearly -$1,843.86

Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitaxe GT l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 97% better power draw (75.0 vs 2,600.0 W). That said, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitaxe GT — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitaxe GT and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 560% more hashrate (5.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe GT 97% better power draw (75.0 vs 2,600.0 W)
  • Bitaxe GT 81% better efficacité (15.0 vs 78.8 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe GT 100% better weight (0.4 vs 10,000.0 kg)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 3367% more heat output (256 vs 8,871 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe GT 191% more score de minage domestique (64.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Bitaxe GT Metric Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
$499 Upfront cost (MSRP)
$0.00 Daily net profit -$5.05
-$499 Net after 1 year -$1,844
-$499 Net after 2 years -$3,688
-$499 Net after 3 years -$5,532
Takes ~26,668.4 years to pay back at current rates Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitaxe GT

$5.05/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe GT

Score: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe GT

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitaxe GT or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-5.05/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitaxe GT vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitaxe GT or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+?

The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitaxe GT and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ on J/TH?

The Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ runs at 78.8 J/TH — a difference of 63.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (15.0 vs 78.8 J/TH).