iBeLink BM-KS Max vs IceRiver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
IceRiver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink BM-KS Max l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 450% more hashrate (11.0 vs 2.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-KS Max's favour. That said, the IceRiver KS2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-KS Max and IceRiver KS2 sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 450% more hashrate (11.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS2 65% better power draw (3,400 vs 1,200 W)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 48% better efficacité (309 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS2 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 19% better weight (12.2 vs 15.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 183% more heat output (11,601 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS2 44% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | IceRiver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,000 |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$6,025 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$7,050 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$8,075 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS2Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-KS Max309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or IceRiver KS2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs IceRiver KS2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS2 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-KS Max at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or IceRiver KS2?
The IceRiver KS2 scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the iBeLink BM-KS Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs IceRiver KS2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the IceRiver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 290.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 48% better efficacité (309 vs 600 J/TH).