iBeLink BM-KS Max vs IceRiver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
IceRiver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink BM-KS Max l'emporte sur 3 des 3 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 45% better efficacité (309 vs 567 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-KS Max and IceRiver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 83% more hashrate (11.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 45% better efficacité (309 vs 567 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 15% better weight (12.2 vs 14.4 kg)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,500 |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$11,400 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$14,299 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$17,199 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-KS Max309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or IceRiver KS3M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-KS Max is more profitable at $-7.76/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs IceRiver KS3M: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs IceRiver KS3M: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs IceRiver KS3M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 257.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficacité (309 vs 567 J/TH).