iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 295 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,007 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 91% better power draw (3,400 vs 295 W) in the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)'s favour. That said, the iBeLink BM-KS Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 511% more hashrate (11.0 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 91% better power draw (3,400 vs 295 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 47% better efficacité (309 vs 164 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 82% better weight (12.2 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 1053% more heat output (11,601 vs 1,007 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 6% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $238 |
| -$7.77 | Daily net profit | -$0.64 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$473 |
| -$7,468 | Net after 2 years | -$708 |
| -$10,302 | Net after 3 years | -$943 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-KS MaxScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)163.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) is more profitable at $-0.64/day compared to $-7.77/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) runs at 163.9 J/TH — a difference of 145.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (309 vs 164 J/TH).