Goldshell CK5 vs Goldshell CK6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK5 | Specification | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 19.3 TH/s |
| 2,400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 200.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 8,500.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 8,189 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK5
Goldshell CK6
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK6 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 61% more hashrate (12.0 vs 19.3 TH/s) in the Goldshell CK6's favour. The Goldshell CK5 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell CK5 and Goldshell CK6 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK6 61% more hashrate (12.0 vs 19.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK5 27% better power draw (2,400 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell CK6 15% better efficacité (200 vs 171 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK6 38% more heat output (8,189 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK5 18% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell CK5 | Metric | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| $998 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$5.33 | Daily net profit | -$7.23 |
| -$2,943 | Net after 1 year | -$3,436 |
| -$4,888 | Net after 2 years | -$6,074 |
| -$6,832 | Net after 3 years | -$8,711 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK5Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK6171.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK5 or the Goldshell CK6?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK5 is more profitable at $-5.33/day compared to $-7.23/day for the Goldshell CK6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK5 or Goldshell CK6?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell CK5 vs Goldshell CK6: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK5 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell CK5 and Goldshell CK6 on J/TH?
The Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH while the Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 29.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficacité (200 vs 171 J/TH).