Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell CK5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 2,400 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 200.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell CK5
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell CK5 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 200 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell CK5 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK5 2222122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK5 25% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,400 W)
- Goldshell CK5 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 200 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 33% more heat output (10,918 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 12% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $998 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$2,943 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$4,887 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$6,832 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK5200.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell CK5?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK5 is more profitable at $-5.33/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell CK5: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell CK5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell CK5?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell CK5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell CK5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,725.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 200 J/TH).