Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 2,400 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 200.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell CK5
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK5 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 200 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK5 3333233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK5 27% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,400 W)
- Goldshell CK5 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 200 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 38% more heat output (11,260 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 92% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $998 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$2,943 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$4,887 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$6,832 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK5200.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK5 is more profitable at $-5.33/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell CK5?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell CK5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK5: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell CK5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK5?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,466.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 200 J/TH).