Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell CK5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 2,400 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 200.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell CK5
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell CK5, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 32432332% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell CK5 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK5 32432332% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 85% better power draw (360 vs 2,400 W)
- Goldshell CK5 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 200 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 100% better weight (2.3 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK5 567% more heat output (1,228 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 165% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $998 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$2,943 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$4,887 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$6,832 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK5200.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell CK5?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-5.33/day for the Goldshell CK5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell CK5: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell CK5: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell CK5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell CK5?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,529.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 200 J/TH).