Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell CK5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Specification | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 460 W | Consommation électrique | 2,400 W |
| 10,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 200.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh
Goldshell CK5
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell CK5 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 27272627% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell CK5 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK5 27272627% more hashrate (0.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 81% better power draw (460 vs 2,400 W)
- Goldshell CK5 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 200 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 100% better weight (2.6 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK5 422% more heat output (1,570 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 165% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Metric | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $998 |
| -$1.10 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$523 | Net after 1 year | -$2,943 |
| -$926 | Net after 2 years | -$4,887 |
| -$1,329 | Net after 3 years | -$6,832 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44MhScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK5200.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell CK5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is more profitable at $-1.10/day compared to $-5.33/day for the Goldshell CK5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell CK5: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell CK5?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell CK5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell CK5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh runs at 10,454,545.5 J/TH while the Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH — a difference of 10,454,345.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 200 J/TH).