Goldshell E-AL1M vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-AL1M | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 38.0 GH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 1,458 W |
| 409.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 80 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-AL1M
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $74,649 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell E-AL1M l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Le colengine P2 a l'avantage en consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
colengine P2Score: 38/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AL1M409.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell E-AL1M or colengine P2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the colengine P2 is more profitable at $-3.50/day compared to $-4.18/day for the Goldshell E-AL1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell E-AL1M or colengine P2?
The colengine P2 is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AL1M at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell E-AL1M or colengine P2?
The colengine P2 scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell E-AL1M and colengine P2?
The Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 37,959.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.