Goldshell E-KA1M vs Goldshell KA BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.2 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 327.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 339.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| — | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-KA1M
Goldshell KA BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell E-KA1M, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 366% more hashrate (5.5 vs 1.2 TH/s) in the Goldshell E-KA1M's favour. The Goldshell KA BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell E-KA1M and Goldshell KA BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell E-KA1M 366% more hashrate (5.5 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX 78% better power draw (1,800 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 3% better efficacité (327 vs 339 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 9% better noise (50.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 350% more heat output (6,142 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX 11% more score de minage domestique (56.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $910 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $305 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.92 |
| -$2,415 | Net after 1 year | -$640 |
| -$3,919 | Net after 2 years | -$975 |
| -$5,424 | Net after 3 years | -$1,310 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOXScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-KA1M327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell E-KA1M or the Goldshell KA BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX is more profitable at $-0.92/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Goldshell KA BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell E-KA1M is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Goldshell KA BOX at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Goldshell KA BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KA BOX scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-KA1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Goldshell KA BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH — a difference of 11.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficacité (327 vs 339 J/TH).