Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 GH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 327.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-KA1M
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell E-KA1M, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 2650% more hashrate (5.5 vs 0.2 TH/s). The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell E-KA1M and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell E-KA1M 2650% more hashrate (5.5 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 94% better power draw (1,800 vs 100 W)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 35% better efficacité (327 vs 500 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 1700% more heat output (6,142 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 56% more score de minage domestique (56.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $910 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$2,415 | Net after 1 year | -$164 |
| -$3,919 | Net after 2 years | -$249 |
| -$5,424 | Net after 3 years | -$334 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-KA1MScore: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-KA1M327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell E-KA1M or Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell E-KA1M or Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
The Goldshell E-KA1M is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell E-KA1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 172.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 35% better efficacité (327 vs 500 J/TH).