Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 327.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| — | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-KA1M
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 72% better power draw (1,800 vs 500 W). That said, the Goldshell E-KA1M isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell E-KA1M and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell E-KA1M 175% more hashrate (5.5 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 72% better power draw (1,800 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 24% better efficacité (327 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 10% better noise (50.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 260% more heat output (6,142 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 11% more score de minage domestique (56.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $910 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $458 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$2,415 | Net after 1 year | -$870 |
| -$3,919 | Net after 2 years | -$1,281 |
| -$5,424 | Net after 3 years | -$1,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell E-KA1M or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell E-KA1M at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell E-KA1M or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-KA1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell E-KA1M and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 77.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficacité (327 vs 250 J/TH).