Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Specification | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 327.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-KA1M
Iceriver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell E-KA1M, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 450% more hashrate (5.5 vs 1.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell E-KA1M's favour. The Iceriver KS1 claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell E-KA1M and Iceriver KS1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell E-KA1M 450% more hashrate (5.5 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS1 67% better power draw (1,800 vs 600 W)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 45% better efficacité (327 vs 600 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 200% more heat output (6,142 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 27% more score de minage domestique (56.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Metric | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $910 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$2,415 | Net after 1 year | -$711 |
| -$3,919 | Net after 2 years | -$1,224 |
| -$5,424 | Net after 3 years | -$1,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-KA1MScore: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-KA1M327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KS1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KS1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell E-KA1M is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Iceriver KS1 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell E-KA1M or the Iceriver KS1?
The Goldshell E-KA1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Iceriver KS1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 272.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficacité (327 vs 600 J/TH).