Ebang Ebit E9 vs StrongU Hornbill H8
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Ebang Ebit E9 | Specification | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 74.0 TH/s |
| 1,077 W | Consommation électrique | 3,330 W |
| 171.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 3,675 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,362 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Ebang | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Ebang Ebit E9
StrongU Hornbill H8
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the StrongU Hornbill H8 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1075% more hashrate (6.3 vs 74.0 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E9 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Ebang Ebit E9 and StrongU Hornbill H8 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- StrongU Hornbill H8 1075% more hashrate (6.3 vs 74.0 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E9 68% better power draw (1,077 vs 3,330 W)
- StrongU Hornbill H8 74% better efficacité (171.0 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- StrongU Hornbill H8 209% more heat output (3,675 vs 11,362 BTU/hr)
- Ebang Ebit E9 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Ebang Ebit E9 | Metric | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| $370 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$2.36 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$1,231 | Net after 1 year | -$3,145 |
| -$2,091 | Net after 2 years | -$5,090 |
| -$2,952 | Net after 3 years | -$7,035 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Ebang Ebit E9Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
StrongU Hornbill H845.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Ebang Ebit E9 or the StrongU Hornbill H8?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E9 is more profitable at $-2.36/day compared to $-5.33/day for the StrongU Hornbill H8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Ebang Ebit E9 or the StrongU Hornbill H8 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Ebang Ebit E9 vs StrongU Hornbill H8: which fits a residential setup better?
The Ebang Ebit E9 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the StrongU Hornbill H8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Ebang Ebit E9 vs StrongU Hornbill H8: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Ebang Ebit E9 runs at 171.0 J/TH while the StrongU Hornbill H8 runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 126.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficacité (171.0 vs 45.0 J/TH).