Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Fluminer L1

Fluminer L1

Taux de hachage 5.3 GH/s Puissance 1,200 W Efficiency 226,415.1 J/TH
VS
Goldshell X6S

Goldshell X6S

Taux de hachage 1.8 GH/s Puissance 2,250 W Efficiency 1,264,044.9 J/TH

Fluminer L1 vs Goldshell X6S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Fluminer L1 Specification Goldshell X6S
5.3 GH/s Taux de hachage 1.8 GH/s
1,200 W Consommation électrique 2,250 W
226,415.1 J/TH Efficiency 1,264,044.9 J/TH
40 dB Niveau de bruit
10.0 kg Weight 5.0 kg
4,094 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,677 BTU/hr
66/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithme Scrypt
FluMiner Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Fluminer L1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.88
Daily Profit -$2.88
Monthly -$86.39
Yearly -$1,051.13

Goldshell X6S

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.40
Daily Profit -$5.40
Monthly -$162.00
Yearly -$1,970.98

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Fluminer L1, which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 82% better efficacité (226,415 vs 1,264,045 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Fluminer L1 — l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Fluminer L1 and Goldshell X6S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Fluminer L1 198% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Fluminer L1 47% better power draw (1,200 vs 2,250 W)
  • Fluminer L1 82% better efficacité (226,415 vs 1,264,045 J/TH)
  • Goldshell X6S 50% better weight (10.0 vs 5.0 kg)
  • Goldshell X6S 88% more heat output (4,094 vs 7,677 BTU/hr)
  • Fluminer L1 154% more score de minage domestique (66.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Fluminer L1 Metric Goldshell X6S
$1,452 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.88 Daily net profit -$5.40
-$2,503 Net after 1 year -$1,971
-$3,554 Net after 2 years -$3,942
-$4,605 Net after 3 years -$5,913
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Fluminer L1

Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Fluminer L1

226,415.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Fluminer L1 or Goldshell X6S more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Fluminer L1 is more profitable at $-2.88/day compared to $-5.40/day for the Goldshell X6S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Fluminer L1 or the Goldshell X6S better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Fluminer L1 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Goldshell X6S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Fluminer L1 or Goldshell X6S?

The Fluminer L1 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell X6S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Fluminer L1 and Goldshell X6S?

The Fluminer L1 runs at 226,415.1 J/TH while the Goldshell X6S runs at 1,264,044.9 J/TH — a difference of 1,037,629.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficacité (226,415 vs 1,264,045 J/TH).