Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Fluminer L1

Fluminer L1

Taux de hachage 5.3 GH/s Puissance 1,200 W Efficiency 226,415.1 J/TH
VS
FluMiner L3

FluMiner L3

Taux de hachage 9.5 GH/s Puissance 1,700 W Efficiency 178,947.4 J/TH

Fluminer L1 vs FluMiner L3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Fluminer L1 Specification FluMiner L3
5.3 GH/s Taux de hachage 9.5 GH/s
1,200 W Consommation électrique 1,700 W
226,415.1 J/TH Efficiency 178,947.4 J/TH
40 dB Niveau de bruit 50 dB
10.0 kg Weight 12.8 kg
4,094 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,800 BTU/hr
66/100 Home Mining Score 56/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithme Scrypt
FluMiner Manufacturer FluMiner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Fluminer L1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.88
Daily Profit -$2.88
Monthly -$86.39
Yearly -$1,051.13

FluMiner L3

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$4.08
Daily Profit -$4.08
Monthly -$122.39
Yearly -$1,489.08

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

The Fluminer L1 and FluMiner L3 finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.

Spec Deltas

The Fluminer L1 and FluMiner L3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • FluMiner L3 79% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Fluminer L1 29% better power draw (1,200 vs 1,700 W)
  • FluMiner L3 21% better efficacité (226,415 vs 178,947 J/TH)
  • Fluminer L1 20% better noise (40.0 vs 50.0 dB)
  • Fluminer L1 22% better weight (10.0 vs 12.8 kg)
  • FluMiner L3 42% more heat output (4,094 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
  • Fluminer L1 18% more score de minage domestique (66.0 vs 56.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Fluminer L1 Metric FluMiner L3
$1,452 Upfront cost (MSRP) $2,849
-$2.88 Daily net profit -$4.08
-$2,503 Net after 1 year -$4,338
-$3,554 Net after 2 years -$5,827
-$4,605 Net after 3 years -$7,316
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Fluminer L1

Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

FluMiner L3

178,947.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Fluminer L1 or FluMiner L3 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Fluminer L1 is more profitable at $-2.88/day compared to $-4.08/day for the FluMiner L3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Fluminer L1 vs FluMiner L3: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Fluminer L1 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the FluMiner L3 at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Fluminer L1 or FluMiner L3?

The Fluminer L1 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the FluMiner L3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Fluminer L1 and FluMiner L3 on J/TH?

The Fluminer L1 runs at 226,415.1 J/TH while the FluMiner L3 runs at 178,947.4 J/TH — a difference of 47,467.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 21% better efficacité (226,415 vs 178,947 J/TH).